Downloads

中美信息技术与稀土反制的动态博弈分析. (2026). 环球社科评论, 3(2), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.62836/ssr.v3n2.1094

中美信息技术与稀土反制的动态博弈分析

马熙伦

上海财经大学金融学院,上海

摘要:本文探究中美信息技术与关键原材料领域的非对称依赖博弈。研究发现,当前的“管制— 反制”格局呈非稳定的僵持状态。引入时间变量后,博弈演化呈现三条路径:回归贸易均衡、系统性脱钩、以及基于替代速度差的非对称脱钩。研究论证了单边制裁效力随跨期替代弹性增加而递减的规律,提出战略窗口期内的速度竞速是决定权力转移的关键。结论认为,政策核心应从静态资源对抗转向“增强结构性反制能力”与“缩短内生替代周期”的双轨并行:前者旨在通过强化短期施压手段,为迫使博弈重回贸易均衡路径保有战略筹码;后者则旨在对冲长期结构性依附风险,从而在规则重构期内确立持久的制度性议价优势。

中美科技竞争 博弈论 出口管制 稀土反制 非对称脱钩

参考文献

[1] Brander J A, Spencer B J. Export subsidies and international market share rivalry[J]. Journal of International Economics, 1985, 18(1): 83-100.
[2] Costinot A, et al. Comparative advantage and optimal trade policy[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2015, 130(2): 659-702.
[3] Farrell H, Newman A L. Weaponized interdependence: How global economic networks shape state coercion[J]. International Security, 2019, 44(1): 42-79.
[4] Bagwell K, Staiger R W. The economics of the world trading system[M]. The MIT Press, 2002.
[5] Costinot A, Rodríguez-Clare A. Trade theory with numbers: Quantifying the consequences of globalization[R]. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, 2013, No. 18896.
[6] Cerdeiro D, et al. Sizing up the effects of technological decoupling[R]. IMF Working Papers, 2021, 2021(069): 1.
[7] Boehm C E, et al. The long and short (Run) of trade elasticities[J]. American Economic Review, 2023, 113(4): 861-905.